Communication
Electrospinning of Heparin Encapsulated P(LLA-CL) Core/Shell Nanofibers
Feng Chen 1*, Peng Huang 2, Xiu-Mei Mo 3*
1State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China.
2Institute of Micro-Nano Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai200240, China.
3College of Chemistry, Chemical engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, China.
* Corresponding authors. Email: Fchen@mail.sic.ac.cn; xmm@dhu.edu.cn
Citation: F. Chen, et al, Electrospinning of Heparin Encapsulated P(LLA-CL) Core/Shell Nanofibers, Nano Biomed. Eng., 2010, 2(1): 56-60.
DOI: 10.5101/nbe.v2i1.p56-60
Abstract
Coaxial electrospinning was developed for simultaneously electrospinning two different polymer solutions into core/shell nanofibers, or encapsulated bioactive molecular and drugs into polymer nanofibers for controlled release. In this study, heparin encapsulated poly(L-lactic acid-co-ε-caprolactone) [P(LLA-CL)] core/shell nanofibers were fabricated in water/2, 2, 2-Trifluoroethanol mixed solvent through coaxial electrospinning. TEM images clearly proved the core/shell structure of nanofibers when the proportion of feeding rates of inner and outer solutions was at 1:3. The morphology of these nanofibers were investigated and discussed from SEM micrographs, and the diameters showed a normal distribution. Furthermore, the fabrics of heparin encapsulated P(LLA-CL) core/shell nanofibers showed a strong inhibit ability on proliferation of fibroblast in cell viability test in vitro.
Keywords: Nanofibers; Heparin; Electrospinning; P(LLA-CL)
1. Introduction
Electrospinning has been recognized as an efficient technique for fabricating polymer nanofibers which could mimic native fibers structure of extra cellular matrix, and be widely used in biomedical area [1-3]. Electrospun nanofibers have received much attention because of their potential applications for biomedical devices, tissue engineering scaffolds, and drug delivery carriers [4]. The development in electrospun fibers has shown that the electrospinning is a promising way for future advanced composite systems [5]. Recently, a spinneret composed of two coaxial capillaries was developed for simultaneously electro- spinning two different polymer solutions into core/shell structured nanofibers [6-7]. Under this technique, various nanofibers were prepared, such as surface-modified nanofibers [8], continuous hollow nanofibers [9], and other functional nanofibers [10]. In addition, it is a powerful method to encapsulated bioactive molecular and drugs into biodegradable polymer [11-14]. Heparin has long been known to inhibit the proliferation of many kinds of cells, such as mesangial cell [15], fibroblast [16] and the vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) [17-18]. In Luong-Van’s report, heparin was blended into poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL), and electrospun into nanofibers which showed effective ability in preventing the proliferation of smooth muscle cells [19]. Poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) [P(LLA-CL)] is a block copolymer of PLLA and PCL, and has been investigated as biomaterials used for surgery and drug delivery system because of good biocompatibility and biodegradability [20]. In this study, heparin contained P(LLA-CL) nanofibers with core/shell structure were obtained using coaxial electrospinning first time. The effect of feeding rate on structure of nanofibers was investigated with TEM. The morphology of nanofibers and the inhibition effect on proliferation of fibroblast were also studied.

Figure 1. Illustration of fabricating core/shell nanofiber.
2. Experimental Section
Heparin (Shanghai Runjie Chemical Reagent LTD., China) and gelatin (Sigma, USA) solution were prepared by dissolving in the mixture solvent of water and 2, 2, 2-Trifluoroethanol (TEF, Shanghai Dari Fine Chemical LTD., China) with the volume ratio of 1:2 (V/V). The concentrations of heparin and gelatin were at 2 and 4 % in weight ratio respectively. P(LLA-CL) (Gunze Limited, Japan) was solved in TEF at a concentration of 6 % in weight ratio. Thereafter, they were used as core and shell solutions for coaxial electrospinning (Figure 1). Two syringe pumps (NE-501, New Era Pump Systems Inc., USA) controlled by a computer were used to feed the solutions to the needles separately. The voltage was applied to the needle at 15 kV using a high-voltage power supplier (BGG6-358, BMEI CO.LTD., China). The grounded plate of aluminum foil and a stainless steel mandrel were located at a fixed distance of 20 cm from the needle tip. As to investigate the effects of core and shell solution on the structure of nanofiber, the feeding rates of core solutions (gelatin/heparin) were controlled at 0.3, 0.4 and 0.6 mL/h, while the corresponding feeding rates of shell solution (P(LLA-CL)) were at 0.9, 0.8 and 0.6 mL/h (Table 1). The total feeding ratio was at 1.2 mL/h. Therefore, the proportions of core and shell solution were 1:3, 1:2 and 1:1. Pure P(LLA-CL) nanofibers was also spun out at a concentration of 6 % as a control. The structure and morphology of the nanofibers were investigated by TEM (HITACHIH-800,Japan) and SEM (JSM-5600, JEOL, Japan). As for cell viability test, coverslips (14 mm in diameter) were used to collect the nanofibers for mat-like fabrics. Then, the fabrics were fixed in 24-well plates with stainless rings and sterilized with 75 % alcohol solution. Fibroblast cells were maintained in 1640 medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 units/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) at 37 oC in a 5 % CO2 humidified atmosphere. Confluent cells were subcultured every 3 d using standard procedure. For cell viability studies, cells were seeded at a density of 3.0×104 cells/cm2 onto the fabrics and tissue culture plates (TCPs) in 24 well plates. At 24, 48, and 72 h, the viability of cells were quantified by MTT (sigma, USA) and Enzyme-labeled Instrument (MK3, Thermo, USA). Data were representative of three independent experiments and all data points were plotted as means ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using Origin 7.5 (Origin Lab Inc., USA). Samples that passed normality and equal variance tests were evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The priori alpha value was set at 0.05 with significance defined as p <0.05.
Table 1. The feeding ratios of core and shell solutions in coaxial electrospinning.

3. Results and Discussion
As shown in Figure 2, the TEM image (Figure 2A) clearly proved the core/shell structure compared with P(LLA-CL) nanofiber (Figure 2D). The diameter of the core was about 90 nm, while the diameter of the core/shell nanofibers was about 470 nm. In the process of electrospinning, the stable compound jet and smooth nanofibers could form when the flow rate of the inner liquid were at 0.3 and 0.4 mL/h. The diameter of the core increased with the flow rate of the inner liquid increased from 0.3 to 0.4 mL/h. however, when the flow rate of inner liquid was up to 0.6 mL/h, a string of beads were observed in the nanofiber (Figure 2C). The diameter of core layer increased with increasing feeding rate of inner solution. However, the overloading of inner solution could lead the presence of beads. The probably reason was the different properties of shell and core solutions. The water and TFE (boiling point 73.6 ℃) had different volatility. Therefore, the increased water content could prohibit expeditiously vaporizing of mixed solvent from nanofibers. The inner part in nanofibers could not be pulled down eventually compared with the out layer, and then the beads formed in the nanofibers. The fine core/shell nanofibers were easily obtained through coaxial electrospinning at a proportion of 1:3 (Figure 3). The diameters of these nanofibers were measured based on the SEM micrographs by using an image visualization software Image J developed by Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences. The diameters of 100 nanofibers showed a normal distribution, and the average diameter was 413 nm (Figure 3C). Furthermore, the core/shell nanofibers were also easily used to form 3D structures by changing collector. The tubular scaffolds were collected on rotaring mandrels with diameters at 1.5 and 4 mm in this study (Figure 3D). Fabroblast cell viability on heparin-contained nanofibers and pure P(LLA-CL) nanofibers were tested by MTT method (Figure 4). Initially, cell growth gradually till culturing time of 48 h, but after that cell growth faster on pure P(LLA-CL) nanofibers than on heparin contained nanofibers. MTT absorption was significantly different on pure P(LLA-CL) and heparin-contained nanofibers when fibroblast cell cultured for 72 h. Proliferation of fibroblasts is a serious problem in surgical wound healing. Based on the location of the injury, the growth of fibroblasts can lead to different problems such as scar tissue formation and premature wound closure. This kind of fabric constructed with heparin incorporated P(LLA-CL) core/shell nanofibers may contribute to a new treatment for these situation caused by exceeding proliferation of fibroblast.

Figure 2. TEM images of core/shell (A-C) and pure P(LLA-CL) (D) nanofibers. The proportions of feeding ratios between inner solution and outer solution were (A) 1:3, (B) 1:2 and (C) 1:1.

Figure 3. SEM images (A, B), diameters distribution (C) and tubular fabrics (D) of core/shell nanofibers.

Figure 4. Inhibition effect of heparin contained core/shell nanofibers on proliferation of fibroblasts.
4. Conclusions
Heparin incorporated P(LLA-CL) nanofibers were obtained through coaxial electrospinning in water/TFE mixed solvent. When the proportion of feeding rate in process of fabrication between inner solution and outer solution were 1:3, TEM investigations clearly proved the core/shell nanofiber of nanofibers. The diameters of 100 nanofibers showed a normal distribution, and the average diameter was ~ 413 nm. These nanofibers were easily used to form mats or tubular structures. The fabrics of heparin incorporated P(LLA-CL) core/shell nanofibers showed strong ability of inhibit effect on proliferation of fibroblast.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National High-Tech Research and Development Programme of China (863 Program, 2008AA03Z305), National Nature Science Foundation of China (30570503), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Program (08520704600, and 0852nm03400).
References
Received 20 February, 2010; accepted 3 March, 2010; published online 5 March, 2010.
Copyright: (c) 2010 F. Chen et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.