←BACK

Review

 

Metal Nanoparticles in Atherosclerosis: Applications and Potential Toxicity

 

Fatemeh Imanparas 1,2, Mahmood Doosti 2, Mohammad Ali Faramarzi 1*

 

1Dpartment of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biotechnology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 14155-6451, Tehran 1417614411, Iran.

2Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran.

 

* Corresponding author. E-mail: faramarz@tums.ac.ir  

 

Received: Aug. 15, 2015; Accepted: Sept. 26, 2015; Published: Sept. 30, 2015.

 

Citation: Fatemeh Imanparast, Mahmood Doosti and Mohammad Ali Faramarzi. Metal Nanoparticles in Atherosclerosis: Applications and Potential Toxicity. Nano Biomed. Eng. 2015, 7(3), 111-127.

DOI: 10.5101/nbe.v7i3.p111-127.

 

Abstract

As a chronic inflammatory disease, atherosclerosis is responsible for thousands of deaths worldwide each year, and it imposes massive economic costs on individuals and on society. Because of its high importance, the discovery of sensitive and accurate strategies for imaging, targeted drug delivery, and therapeutic monitoring of this condition is essential. In recent years, continuous research has achieved remarkable successes in the use of nanotechnology in the molecular imaging and treatment of atherosclerosis. Among various nanoparticles such as metallic, polymeric, and lipid metallic nanoparticles are being considered due to their unique properties for use in treatment and imaging. It should be taken into consideration that some of the metal nanoparticles themselves can cause adverse biological effects, and these effects should be considered important risk factors in the pathological pathways leading up to atherosclerosis. This review provides a description of the applications and potential toxicity of metal nanoparticles in atherosclerosis.

 

Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Metals; Imaging; Drug delivery; Nanoparticles; Toxicity

 

Abbreviations

NPs, Nanoparticles; CVD, Cardiovascular disease; CHD, Coronary heart disease; ox-LDL, Oxidized low-density lipoprotein; VSMCs, Vascular smooth muscle cells; NO, Nitric oxide; eNOS, Endothelial NO synthase; ROSs, Reactive oxygen species; O2.-, Superoxide; VCAM-1, Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; ICAM-1, Intercellular adhesion molecule-1; M-CSF, Monocyte colony-stimulating factor; SRs, Scavenger receptors; MMPs, Matrix- degrading metalloproteinases; PDGF, Platelet-derived growth factor; FGF-2, Fibroblast growth factor-2; TGF-β, Transforming growth factor-β; MRI, Magnetic particle imaging; US, Ultrasound; PET, Positron emission tomography; CT, Computed tomography; SPECT, Single photon emission computed tomography; USPIO, Ultra-small particles of iron oxide; SPIONs, Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; AHA, American Heart Association; Au, Gold; Au- HDL, Gold high-density lipoprotein nanoparticles; PPTT, Plasmonic photothermal therapy; NIR, Near- infrared; IVUS/IVPA, Intravascular ultrasound and photoacoustic; AgNPs, Silver NPs; AGE, Advanced glycation end; MPs, Microparticles; TiO2, Titanium dioxide; Fe2O3, Iron oxide; Y2O3, Yttrium oxide; ZnO, Zinc oxide; HAECs, Human aortic endothelial cells; Zn, Zinc; HUVEC, Human umbilical vein endothelial cells.


Introduction

In recent years, nanoparticles (NPs) have been used in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of human diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disorders due to their limited retention to binding sites and mild side-effects [1−3]. Among various types of NPs, metal NPs exhibit unique diagnostic and therapeutic properties and have been extensively applied for medical purposes [4, 5]. Atherosclerosis, one of the most prevalent chronic vascular inflammatory diseases, arises by endothelial dysfunction, imbalance in lipid metabolism, and maladaptive immune response [6, 7]. Metal NPs have many applications for imaging and targeted drug delivery to each step in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Therefore, they can be of use in preventing the pathophysiological consequences of atherosclerosis, such as thrombotic strokes [8−12]. Although metal NPs have various applications, they may have limitations and may be toxic to humans [13−17]. This review provides a description of the benefits and risks of metal NPs in the treatment or induction of atherosclerosis. It also describes metal NP-based strategies regarding site- selective delivery of diagnostic probes to therapeutic targets of atherosclerosis disease. The targeted use of metal NPs and their toxicity are dependent on disease mechanisms. Therefore, before a description of the benefits and risks of metal NPs is given, a summary of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of atherosclerosis is useful to clarify the role of metal nanoparticles in atherosclerosis.

 

Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death in modern industrialized countries and an increasingly frequent cause of death in developing countries [8, 18]. The main types of CVD are coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke that atherosclerosis is the pathology that causes them, it is a multifactorial disease and involves several cell types [19, 20]. This section summarizes the cellular and molecular mechanisms of atherosclerosis. In summary, the pathologic steps that cause atherosclerosis include endothelial dysfunction initiated by the risk factors, inflammation, foam cell formation (up-take of the oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) by macrophages), migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), plaque rupture, and thrombus formation [21-23]. Because metal NPs can be used at each step of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, and because their specificity for each step is dependent on targeting by specific molecules involved in every step, the above steps are described briefly below. Atherosclerosis is initiated through damage of the endothelium by risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, elevated plasma homocysteine concentrations, smoking, and high levels of LDL [24−28]. The effects of these risk factors on endothelial cells manifest as molecular changes. These molecular changes are primarily due to a decrease in normal nitric oxide (NO) production by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), which is due to an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROSs) production by an increase in the expression and activation of the superoxide (O .-)- producing enzymes, especially NADH2  oxidase. Increased O2.- decreases NO production by eNOS, and this enzyme produces O .- rather than nitric oxide (Fig. 1) [29]. NO modulates many processes involved in the normal activity of endothelial cells, and ROSs modulates many processes involved in atherosclerosis, such as inflammation, apoptosis, VSMC proliferation, angiogenesis, and matrix turnover. The final result of these molecular changes is endothelial dysfunction [30, 31]. Endothelial dysfunction increases endothelial expression of selectins and cell adhesion molecules, such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) [32]. Platelets adhere to dysfunctional endothelial cells and release inflammatory factors such as proteases and vasoactive substances, which leads to recruitment and adhesion of neutrophils and monocytes to this area [33, 34]. First, leukocytes roll along the endothelial surface of the vessel wall by selectins P-selectin, for example and then adhere tightly to the endothelium by VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 [32]. Tight junctions between endothelial cells are destroyed due to endothelial injury; as a result, the endothelium permeability increases, and leukocytes can migrate through the endothelium into the intima. In the intima, monocytes are influenced by growth factors such as monocyte colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and cytokines such as TNF-α and IFN-γ, and they then differentiate to macrophages. Due to increased permeability of the endothelium, LDL infiltrates into the blood vessel wall intima and is there modified to oxidized LDL by ROSs [35]. During the maturation process of macrophages, expression of various scavenger receptors (SRs) including SRs-A and CD36 that can bind and internalize modified LDL increase. Due to increased SRs-A and CD36 expression on macrophages and ox-LDL in the intima, macrophages internalize ox-LDL, resulting in the accumulation of ox-LDL in the macrophages and the formation of foam cells (Fig. 2). Foam cells release growth factors and cytokines which are involved in lesion progression and matrix-degrading metalloproteinases (MMPs) which stimulate matrix degradation [36−38]. VSMCs are stimulated by growth factors and cytokines such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and migrate from the media into the intima. As a result of the formation of a fibrous cap, fatty streaks develop to advanced atherosclerotic plaques (Fig. 3). MMPs permit the migration of VSMCs from the media into the intima; as a result, the plaques develop into more complex lesions. Macrophages under the influence of inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-α also undergo apoptosis, which can result in necrotic core formation [23, 37, 39]. Plaque rupture can occur by thinning of the fibrous cap due to VSMCs, macrophage apoptosis, and inflammation occurring within the plaque. Plaque rupture can result in activation of proteases such as serine proteases and MMPs, leading to degradation of extracellular proteins, such as collagen, and thinning of the cap. Research also suggests that microvessels form more frequently in unstable plaques than in stable plaques; in other words, microvessel rupture actually causes the instability in unstable plaque [37, 40−42]. Plaque rupture exposes highly thrombogenic plaque constituents to the bloodstream, leading to platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. A thrombus can completely occlude the blood vessel, resulting in heart attack or stroke. Some important biomarkers that are used as targets for NPs in imaging and drug delivery for atherosclerosis are presented in Table 1 [10, 12, 43-52].

 

Fig. 1 The production of NO in endothelial cells and control of vascular tone. (a) A normal endothelial cell. Normal levels of NO are produced from L-arginine by eNOS in the presence of BH4 as its cofactor. NO modulates many processes involved in the normal activity of endothelial cells, such as regulation of vascular tone by conversion of GTP to cGMP as an activator of protein kinase G. An important action of this enzyme is vascular smooth muscle relaxation, which leads to vasodilation. (b) A dysfunctional endothelial cell and eNOS uncoupling. Cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, andchronic smoking increase expression and activation of O2·- producing enzymes (especially NADH2 oxidase) that increase ROSs in the vascular wall. O2·- reacts avidly with vascular NO to form ONOO-. The cofactor BH4 is highly sensitive to oxidation by ONOO-. Diminished levels of BH4 promote O2·- production by eNOS; this is referred to as eNOS uncoupling.

 

Fig. 2 Foam cell formation. In normal circumstances, tight junctions between endothelial cells prevent the entry of monocytes into the sub-endothelial space (intima). Initial damage of the endothelium by cardiovascular risk factors (1) results in an inflammatory response. As a result, ROSs production increases (2). ROSs cause breakdown of tight junctions (3) and expression of P-selectin and cellular adhesion molecules (CAMs) (4). High LDLs enter into the sub-endothelial space (5) and oxide by ROSs (6). P-selectin and CAMs recruit circulating monocytes (7−8), monocytes enter into the artery wall from the bloodstream (9), and there the monocytes differentiate into macrophages via pro-inflammatory factors such as M-CSF (10). Pro-inflammatory factors act on macrophages, leading to increased expression of downstream scavenger receptors (SRs) on their surface (11). Macrophages then ingest oxidized LDL by SRs (12) and convert to foam cells (13).

 

Fig. 3 Formation of the plaque. VSMCs are stimulated by MMPs and growth factors such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and they then migrate from the media into the intima. VSMCs and extracellular matrix fibers such as collagens and fibronectin form a fibrous cap and develop foam cells to advanced atherosclerotic plaques.

 

Table 1: Some of the important biomarkers of atherosclerosis for targeting imaging and drug delivery

 

Metal Nanoparticles and Atherosclerosis

Metal nanoparticles have many applications in industry and in medicine [53−55]. In recent years, many efforts have been made to develop early detection methods for molecular and cellular abnormalities leading to atherosclerosis and to develop treatments for preventing fatal consequences such as heart attacks and strokes [56−59]. From the expression of the molecular mechanisms leading to atherosclerosis described in the second section, it can be inferred that several key steps including endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, foam cell formation, VSMC migration and proliferation, plaque rupture, and thrombus formation are involved in this disease, and that each of these steps can be targeted by imaging techniques for diagnosis and treatment. Conventional imaging techniques in the diagnosis of atherosclerosis include magnetic particle imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) [60−64]. Although these methods are only capable of detecting cellular and molecular changes in advanced stages of atherosclerosis, scientists are currently looking at ways to detect atherosclerosis as early as possible [65, 66]. NPs can be used in the prevention, control, diagnosis, treatment, and screening of atherosclerosis. Targeted NPs are considered efficient tools for localizing and staging of atherosclerosis and for identifying it as quickly as possible in patient check-ups. Various materials such as liposomes for ultrasound imaging, polyamidoamine (PAMAM) and diaminobutane (DAB) dendrimers for MIR, gold NPs for optical coherent tomography, quantum dots for fluorescence tomography, and iron microparticles or dextran coated ultra-small particles of iron oxide (USPIO) for MIR — are used to enhance image quality and sensitivity to the various stages of atherosclerosis [67]. Metal NPs possess unique chemical and physical properties and have various applications in medicine according to their size and type. Due to the resonant oscillations of their free electrons in the presence of light, metal NPs have unique photothermal and optical properties. They also have the ability to radiate light, which can be used in imaging, and rapid conversion into heat, which is used in the treatment of artherosclerosis [68]. Although the use of metal NPs in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases such as atherosclerosis is being considered, it should be noted that NPs of certain types and particle sizes can disrupt the body’s homeostasis and can cause diseases such as atherosclerosis [14, 69]. In the following sections, metal NP applications in the monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of atherosclerotic disease will be discussed. The adverse effects of some metal NPs, which may lead to atherosclerosis, will also be discussed [69].

 

Iron oxide nanoparticles and atheroscle-rosis

Today, molecular and cellular imaging for non- invasive control of the biological processes at each stage of a disease are being considered, and in the case of atherosclerosis, access to contrast agents is a necessity. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are considered an efficient contrast agent, and they have many applications, especially in revealing inflammatory diseases and identifying the cell surface markers of various diseases such as cancer and atherosclerosis [11, 51,70−73]. Therefore, the use of SPIONs in molecular imaging of the various stages of atherosclerosis provides early detection and monitoring of treatment effectiveness. Although SPIONs have been used in imaging for many years, efforts are focused on improving their surface and targeting strategies for identifying specific cell-surface molecules (Table 2) [9, 10, 12, 45, 74−89]. This section will offer a glimpse of the structural and functional properties of SPIONs and provide a description of their applications in atherosclerosis, particularly in imaging, surface modification, and targeting to increase their effectiveness. Finally, the negative effects that they may have in the pathogenesis of this disease will be discussed. SPIONs typically consist of two parts: an iron oxide core (Fe3O4 and γ Fe2O3) and a hydrophilic coating. They are available in a wide range of sizes, including oral-SPION at between 300 nm and 3.5 μm, standard SPIO (SSPION) at 60-150 nm, and an ultra-small SPIO (USPION) of approximately 10−40 nm [90]. There are two general biological and chemical methods for the synthesis of metal NPs, but the most common chemical methods for production of SPIONs are co-precipitation (ferrous and ferric co-precipitation in an alkaline solution) and microemulsions (suspending a ferrous salt-surfactant precipitate to an aqueous solution, then adding a base to form a magnetic precipitate) [90, 91]. Surface coating agents — such as citrate, dextran, polycarboxymethyl dextran, PLGA, and silica — are used for colloid stability and biocompatibility of SPIONs [90, 92−93].As discussed above, the size and particular coating of SPIONs effect their pharmacokinetic characteristics, such as phagocytosis capacity, bloodstream clearance, the time required for detection of loss of signal on MRI, toxicity, and the mechanisms of their endocytosis into target cells [94, 95]. Such as the time required for detection of a loss of signal on MRI for citrate-coated SPIONs is much shorter than that of polymer-coated SPIONs [87, 88]. Wagner et al. studied accumulation of citrate-coated SPIONs in atherosclerotic plaques, and the results of this study indicated that the time required for detection of loss of signal on MRI for these SPIONs is 1 h after intravenous injection (compared to 24 to 48 h for polymer-coated SPIONs) with a dose 0.05 of mmol Fe/kg (compared to 0.2−1 mmol Fe/Kg for nanoparticles coated with polymer [88]. Due to their small size, USPIONs are able to escape the phagocytic systems of the liver and the spleen, so they have a long half-life in the bloodstream. This allows for their uptake by macrophages throughout the body, such as the macrophages in the atherosclerotic plaque (Fig. 4) [96, 97]. Due to their appropriate biocompatibility and bioavailability, dextran-coated USPIONs are a suitable contrast agent in MRI of atherosclerotic plaques. Some forms of dextran-coated USPIONs, such as Ferumoxtran-10, are produced commercially and used for imaging of atherosclerotic plaques and for the monitoring of the effects of drugs such as statins [9, 11, 56, 77, 98]. Morris et al. used UPIONs to assess the effects of P38 MAPK inhibitor (SB239063) on atherosclerotic plaque [99]. Appropriate surface modifications of SPIONs may even be helpful in avoiding their adverse effects; vascular endothelial dysfunction is caused by SPIONs through increased oxidative stress, and stimulates the expression of adhesion molecules that the surface modification of SPIONs can reduce these adverse effects [87]. In addition to appropriate coating of the surface, specific functional groups on SPION surfaces for atherosclerotic biomarkers for having minimum signal-to-background ratio, minimal time for detecting signal loss of MRI and limited retention of them at atherosclerotic plaque are required [76]. Therefore, researchers need a detailed understanding of the mechanisms of atherosclerotic plaque formation and the identification of specific cell surface biomarkers such as SR-As on macrophages and VSMCs in plaques [100-101]. Segers et al. reported successful development of SR- A-targeted USPIO and its use in animal models for imaging of atherosclerotic plaques [10]. Investigations have shown that macrophage burden and the presence of plaque calcifying microvesicles are appropriate criteria for plaque characterization. However, the presence of calcifying microvesicles is a much more efficient criteria for determining the American Heart Association (AHA) type and amount of plaque instability [11, 102, 103]. Citrate-coated SPIONs accumulate in macrophages and microvesicles, whereas polymer-coated SPIONs are only able to accumulate in macrophages [88]. Although it is often said that vulnerable plaques have a thin fibrosis cap with a lipid-rich core, they may also have other molecular and histopathological characteristics. The development of efficient diagnostic methods for the identification of biomarkers for each step involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis can be used to determine the appropriate therapeutic strategies for the prevention of thrombosis [76, 104−106]. In 2012, Burden et al. reported successful development of R832-USPION and R826-USPION for targeting of VCAM-1 (as a biomarker of inflammation) and phosphatidylserine (as a biomarker of apoptosis). SPIONs can also be used for targeted drug delivery such as transfection of therapeutic genes to different cells involved in the pathogenesis of this disease [107, 108]. Due to the high importance of endothelial injury at the start of the molecular and cellular changes leading to atherosclerosis, the vascular endothelium is a therapeutic target for genetic modification by therapeutic gene transfection to resistance against damage [109]. Namgung et al. developed hybrid SION-branched polyethylenimine magnetoplexes for therapeutic gene transfection to endothelial cells (Fig. 4) [58]. SPIONs mainly undergo endocytosis into monocytes/macrophages by using non-specific receptors, which is known as passive targeting [10]. In endocytosis of SPIONs into macrophages, cytokines and receptors such as SR-A and MAC-1 are involved [10, 51, 58, 70, 110, 111]. Litovsky et al. reported that the uptake of SPIONs into macrophages in the presence of TNF-α, IL-1β and interferon-γ takes place multiple times [70]. Different cell types involved in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis express SR-A receptors at a high-level, and these receptors play a role in many processes leading to plaque formation. In lipoprotein endocytosis in particular they play a key role [100, 101], so they probably also have a role in the uptake of SPIONs into macrophages. Raynal et al. reported the relationship between SPIONs endocytosis and SR-A by comparing the role of these receptors in endocytosis of ferumoxide (dextran-coated iron oxide NPs, 120-180 nm) and ferumoxtran10 (dextran- coated iron oxide NPs, 15-30 nm). The results of their experiments showed that ferumoxide endocytosis is inhibited in the presence of specific ligands of SR- A, polyinosinic acid, and fucoidan, but these have no effect on the endocytosis of ferumoxtran10. Consequently, the SR-A receptors may play no role in small-sized SPIONs endocytosis; other receptors are probably involved [111]. As integrin Mac-1 receptors on the surface of monocytes, particularly activated monocytes (macrophages), express at high levels in inflammation and involve in processes such as leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells [112]. It is likely that these receptors are also involved in the uptake of SPIONs, particularly small SPIONs [10]. Muhlen et al. studied the role of Mac-1 in endocytosis amino-PVA SPIONs and ferumoxtran10 NPs with different coatings and similar sizes (~30 nm) in vitro, results showed endocytosis of both types of nanoparticle was inhibited in the presence of anti- Mac-1 antibodies. Therefore, Mac-1 receptors are involved in the endocytosis of small SPIONs with different coatings [113]. Muhlen et al. surveyed Mac-1’s role in the endocytosis of SPIONs into macrophages in vivo by comparing the uptake of anti- Mac-1 antibody-targeted SPIONs to the uptake of non- targeted SPIONs. However, contrary to expectations, no differences in NPs uptake by macrophages in either targeted or non-targeted SPIONs were observed [51]. This result was inconsistent with the result in vitro, perhaps due to the fact that Muhlen used large particles with a size of approximately 100 nm for the in vivo studies. It is recommended that both in vitro and in vivo studies be done simultaneously with the small SPIONs.

 

Table 2. Some types of coatings of the superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles surface

 

Fig. 4 Applications of iron oxide NPs in atherosclerosis. (a) Targeted and coated iron oxide NPs are used in the diagnosis and imaging of diverse cells, such as macrophages, that are involved in the formation of atherosclerotic plaques. (b) They also have therapeutic applications, such as therapeutic gene transfection to endothelial cells.

 

Gold nanoparticles in screening, treatment, and diagnosis

Due to their low toxicity and ease of synthesis, modification, and detection, gold (Au) nanoparticles are of special interest in diagnosis and drug delivery [114- 119]. Gold nanoparticles are used as a contrast agent for noninvasive imaging techniques, such as CT for imaging of atherosclerotic plaque by characterization of macrophage burden and calcification [116]. Cormode et al. used gold high-density lipoprotein nanoparticles (Au-HDL) as a suitable contrast agent for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque [52]. Moreover, Lim et al. used dextran-coated gold nanoparticles as CT imaging agents for imaging of atherosclerotic plaque [120]. Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) using near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation is one of the strategies for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Through the reduction of lipids as the inflammatory and necrotic composition of plaque, this noninvasive technique restores vessel lumen diameter and thus delays complications of atherosclerosis such as myocardial infarction, and NPs are used as optically active composite spherical particles [114, 121−123]. Kharlamov et al. used silica-gold NPs in PPTT to restore lumen diameter, and their results showed that gold NPs inhibit LPS-induced nitric oxide production in macrophages by blocking of NF-kB and IFN-β/ STAT1 pathways (Fig. 5) [59]. Diabetes has always been considered one of the most important risk factors in the development of atherosclerosis. In fact, cardiovascular complications particularly atherosclerosis are some of the main causes of death in people with diabetes [25]. Research shows that oxidative stress is one of the most important factors in the development and progression of diabetes, and investigators are looking into therapeutic agents for reducing oxidative stress. In this area, the antioxidant and oxidant effects of metal NPs are of special interest because of their widespread use in industry and medicine [132]. BarathManiKanth et al. studied the antioxidant effects of gold nanoparticles on diabetic rats, and their results showed that the activity of antioxidant enzymes and serum biochemical patterns (such as the glucose and lipid levels) of diabetic mice treated with gold nanoparticles are normal [133]. First, the main target cells for AgNPs are endothelial cells in different positions such as retinal and brain microvessel endothelial cells and AgNPs cause opposite effects in them, including inhibition (anti- inflammatory) and induction (pro-inflammatory) of permeability [145, 151]. Second, AgNPs may cause atherosclerosis by up-regulation of pro-inflammatory molecules [145]. However, AgNPs may also prevent atherosclerosis by inhibiting AGE products and angiogenesis [151, 153]. Thus, based on to the results of previous studies and the results of Rosas-Hernández et al. which indicated that AgNPs have size and concentration-dependent selective and specifi effects on the vascular endothelium and in different concentrations can display opposite effects it has been demonstrated that AgNPs induce vasoconstriction and vasodilation in low and high concentrations, respectively [154]. Therefore, we recommend a comprehensive and simultaneous study with different sizes and concentrations of AgNPs and in adverse target cells and animal models to reach a general conclusion about the role of AgNPs in relation to atherosclerosis.

 

Ambient metal NPs: safe or harmful?

Manufactured metal NPs such as iron oxide and gold have many applications in treatment, diagnosis, and treatment monitoring. However, it should be noted that, due to extensive use of metal NPs in various industries, humans are frequently exposed to a variety of ambient metal NPs in a variety of ways, including ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption [155]. Based on the physicochemical characteristics of these metal NPs, they may cause toxicity by interaction with macromolecules such as genes and proteins, but they may also inhibit tumor metastasis by stimulating the immune system [156, 157]. The toxicity of the metal oxides depends on their composition and size. For example, iron oxide has no toxicity or low toxicity in different sizes. Also, CuO NPs are much more toxic than CuO microparticles (MPs), and titanium dioxide (TiO2) MPs are much more toxic than TiO2 MPs [69]. Yu et al. showed that CuO NPs cause a dose-and time- dependent increase in expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, a molecule that is involved in the pathogenesis of several cardiovascular diseases such as arthrosclerosis [158]. A main mechanism for the toxicity effects induced by metal oxide is increasing ROSs and causing oxidative stress [159- 160]. In another study, Gojova et al. evaluated the effects of different concentrations of iron oxide (Fe2O3), yttrium oxide (Y2O3), and zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs on the expression of inflammatory molecules including ICAM-1, IL-8, and MAP-1 in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs). The results showed that Fe2O3 NPs have no effect on HAECs, but Y2O3 and ZnO NPs can provoke an inflammatory response by up-regulation of ICAM-1, IL-8, and MAP-1. The effects of ZnO are more significant than those of Y2O3 [13]. Suzuki et al. surveyed the effects of ZnO NPs on migration and adhesion of monocytes/macrophages to endothelial cells and acceleration of foam cell formation as the two main steps in pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The results showed that ZnO NPs induce migration and adhesion of monocytes/ macrophages to endothelial cells by up-regulation of the expression of adhesive molecules such as MCP-1 and ICAM-1. The results also showed that ZnO NPs increase macrophage cholesterol uptake by up-regulation of the expression of receptors such as SR-A [161-164]. Rising intracellular zinc (Zn) concentration may be one of the possible reasons for the pro-inflammatory effect of ZnO NPs [165]. In accordance with previous studies, the above study also demonstrated that Zn plays an essential role in the activity and localization of protein kinase C, one of the key modulators of the inflammatory process. However, this must be further researched. TiO2 NPs have diverse applications as photocatalysts and pharmaceuticals [166, 167]. TiO2 is able to cross the lung-circulation barrier and enter the bloodstream [168], therefore, TiO2 NPs may be able to activate endothelial cells in the blood vessels. TiO2 causes a size-dependent activation of endothelial cells by increasing expression of the molecules involved in pro-inflammatory events, such as ICAM-1 and MCP-1. Research shows that small TiO2 NPs have no effect on the endothelium, but sub-micrometer TiO2 NPs cause endothelial dysfunction and inflammation by increasing the expression of pro-inflammatory molecules, suchas ICAM-1 and MCP-1 [169, 170]. The latter study showed that TiO2 increases expression of adhesion molecules (such as P-selections and VCAM-1) and inflammatory molecules (such as tissue factor and angiotensin-II) on HUVEC by inducing the production of ROSs and activating the NF-κB pathway. However, in this study, due to the small size of TiO2, (TEM showed TiO2 spheres of 50 nm or less) no effects on the endothelium were expected, but pro-inflammatory effects were observed. This is possibly due to particles aggregation in the culture medium (Zetasizer showed a mean size of 421 nm). We recommend conducting in vivo experiments parallel to in vitro experiments for more accurate conclusions. Nickel NPs (Ni NPs) are used as sensors and in electronic applications due to their physicochemical characteristics, including a high level of surface energy, high magnetism, low melting point, high surface area, and low burning point. However, studies show that Ni NPs induce systemic inflammation due to rising ROSs [171, 172]. More research is needed to evaluate their direct effects on the molecules and cells involved in the pathology of atherosclerosis.

 

Fig. 5 Applications of gold NPs in atherosclerosis. (a) Gold NPs inhibit LPS-induced nitric oxide production in macrophages by blocking NF-kB and IFN-b/STAT1 pathways. (b) Gold NPs are used in Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) for restoration of lumen diameter. (c) Gold highdensity lipoprotein nanoparticles (Au-HDL) are used as targeted contrast agents for the diagnosis and imaging of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques.

 

Potential  effects  of  silver  NPs  in treatment or induction of atherosclerosis

Silver NPs (AgNPs) are widely used as a free radical scavenging, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory component [134−138]. Research shows that AgNPs are able to treat certain diseases; including retinal neovascularization and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [139, 140]. This section surveys the potential effects of AgNPs in the treatment or induction of atherosclerosis. According to most studies in this field, the three main processes of AgNP targets associated with blood vessels are angiogenesis, endothelial cell permeability, and expression of pro-inflammatory molecules [141−146]. Angiogenesis has physiological and pathological effects. On the one hand, angiogenesis is required for physiological processes such as menstrual bleeding and wound healing [147, 148]. On the other hand, angiogenesis has a pathological role in the growth of atherosclerotic plaque [149]. Therefore, the use of inhibitors to reduce angiogenesis can help to prevent atherosclerotic plaque development. AgNPs inhibit angiogenesis in bovine retinal endothelial cells [139]. One of the main outcomes of endothelial dysfunction is endothelial cell permeability, which plays a key role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [150]. AgNPs inhibit vascular permeability by inhibition of Src phosphorylation, one of the most important molecules involved in the signaling mechanism of endothelial cell permeability [151]. Advanced glycation end (AGE) products are an important risk factor in the pathogenesis of vascular disorders such as diabetes and atherosclerosis [152]. Sheikpranbabu et al. showed that AgNPs inhibit the stimulatory effect of AGE products on endothelial cell permeability (Fig. 6) [151]. Shi et al. surveyed AgNPs effects on inducing endothelial dysfunction; results clearly showed that AgNPs up-regulate expression of the inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, and chemokines in HUVECs [146]. According to the different results of diverse studies with unequal conditions, we arrive at two general observations: First, the main target cells for AgNPs are endothelial cells in different positions such as retinal and brain microvessel endothelial cells and AgNPs cause opposite effects in them, including inhibition (anti- inflammatory) and induction (pro-inflammatory) of permeability [145, 151]. Second, AgNPs may cause atherosclerosis by up-regulation of pro-inflammatory molecules [145]. However, AgNPs may also prevent atherosclerosis by inhibiting AGE products and angiogenesis [151, 153]. Thus, based on to the results of previous studies and the results of Rosas-Hernández et al. which indicated that AgNPs have size and concentration-dependent selective and specifi effects on the vascular endothelium and in different concentrations can display opposite effects it has been demonstrated that AgNPs induce vasoconstriction and vasodilation in low and high concentrations, respectively [154]. Therefore, we recommend a comprehensive and simultaneous study with different sizes and concentrations of AgNPs and in adverse target cells and animal models to reach a general conclusion about the role of AgNPs in relation to atherosclerosis.

 

Fig. 6 Inhibition of the stimulatory effect of AGE products on endothelial cell permeability by AgNPs. (a) Components of the tight and adherent junctions between porcine retinal endothelial cells (PRECs). (b) Cultured porcine retinal endothelial cells (PRECs) were exposed to AGE-modified bovine serum albumin (AGE-BSA) or VEGF. AGE-BSA and VEGF induce permeability via the Src kinase pathway, and AGE-BSA also decreases the expression of occludin and ZO-1. Src is phosphorylated and activated by AGE-BSA and VEGF, then the phosphorylation of the cadherin-catenin complex mediated by Src PTKs can promote the dissociation of junctional proteins from their cytoskeletal anchors. The endothelial cell permeability was detected by measuring the flux of RITC-dextran across the PREC monolayers. (c) Ag-NPs inhibit the AGE-BSA and VEGF-induced permeability.

 

Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

Metal NPs have numerous applications, but due to some adverse effects on human health, their usage has limitations. Because the different applicative or adverse effects of NPs strongly depend on their physicochemical properties such as size and type, extensive studies should be performed with various conditions to develop NPs with maximal advantages and minimal toxicity before they are used in clinical practice. The use of biomarkers for targeting various metal NPs, different coatings for increasing bioavailability, and improvement of other physicochemical properties of metal NPs are required for various applications such as imaging and treatment. Different biomarkers such as VCAM-1 (for endothelial dysfunction) and SRs (for macrophages) that are involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis have been discovered and investigated, but the main limitation in this area is insufficient knowledge about biomarkers that are completely specific to particular steps of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, especially for the initial stages of this disease. Further knowledge about such biomarkers would allow individuals susceptible to this disease to be detected and given preventative treatment. It is hoped that the rapid growth in genomics and molecular biology will pave the way to this knowledge. Complete understanding of the molecular and cellular features of atherosclerosis, particularly in high-risk areas such as the coronary and carotid arteries, will help us improve the design of metal NPs for imaging and treatment of atherosclerosis. Endothelial dysfunction is one of the most important steps in the pathogenesis of vascular diseases, and much research has been done to diagnose and treat this injury using metal NPs in both in vitro and in vivo conditions. However, the endothelial cells of blood vessels have remarkable heterogeneity in structure and function that is dependent on time, location, and health and disease conditions [173]. Thus, although the research conducted on the effects and applications of NPs has partly revealed their applications and toxic effects on high-risk areas such as the endothelial cells of the aorta, coronary, and carotid arteries, more detailed studies on the endothelial cells of these areas in both in vitro and in vivo conditions are required to apply this knowledge in the clinical setting. Nevertheless, metal NPs have diverse applications in the treatment of atherosclerosis, especially in imaging techniques. But more extensive efforts are needed to improve tissue-specific targeting and to limit the toxicity of metal NPs.

 

References

[1]   M.H. Amtenbrink, H. Hofmann, X. Montet, Superparamagnetic nanoparticles - a tool for early diagnostics. Swiss Medical Weekly, 2014, 140:1-8.

[2]  I. Brigger, C. Dubernet, P. Couvreur, Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2012, 64: 24-36.

[3]  I. Cicha, C.D. Garlichs, C, Alexiou, Cardiovascular therapy through nanotechnology. European Journal of Nanomedicine, 2014, 6: 63-87.

[4]   J. Conde, G. Doria, P. Baptista, Noble metal nanoparticles applications in cancer. Journal of Drug Delivery, 2012, 6: 1-12.

[5]    S. Jain, D.G. Hirst, J.M. O’sullivan, Gold nanoparticles as novel agents for cancer therapy. British Journal of Radiology, 2012, 85: 101-113.

[6]   K.J. Moore, F.J. Sheedy, E.A. Fisher, Macrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance. Nat. Annual Review of Immunology, 2013, 13: 709-721.

[7]  L.G. Spagnoli, E. Bonanno, G. Sangiorgi, et al., Role of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2007, 48: 1800-1815.

[8]  T. Cyrus, P.M. Winte, S.D. Caruthers, et al., Magnetic resonance nanoparticles for cardiovascular molecular imaging and therapy. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 2005, 3: 705-715.

[9]  M.E. Kooi, V.C. Cappendijk, K.B.J.M. Cleutjens, et al., Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging, Circulation, 2003, 107: 2453-2458.

[10]  F. M. E. Segers,  B. Adel,  I. Bot,  et al.,  Scavenger receptor- AI-targeted iron oxide nanoparticles for in vivo MRI detection of atherosclerotic lesions. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology., 2013, 33: 1812-1819.

[11]  R.A. Trivedi, J. U-King-Im, M.J. Graves, et al., In vivo detection of macrophages in human carotid atheroma temporal dependence of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced MRI. Stroke, 2004, 35: 1631-1635.

[12]  C. Tu,  T. S. C. Ng,  H. Sohi,  et al.,  Receptor-targeted iron oxide nanoparticles for molecular MR Imaging of inflamed atherosclerotic plaques. Biomaterials, 2011, 32:7209-7216.

[13]  A. Gojova,  B. Guo,  R. S. Kota,  et al.,  Induction of inflammation in vascular endothelial cells by metal oxide nanoparticles: effect of particle composition. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2007, 115: 403-409.

[14]  F. Benetti, L. Bregoli, I. Olivato, et al., Effects of metal (loid)-based nanomaterials on essential element homeostasis: the central role of nanometallomics for nanotoxicology. Metallomics, 2014, 6: 729-747.

[15]  Z. Chen, H. Meng, G. Xing, et al., Acute toxicological effects of copper nanoparticles in vivo, Toxicology Letters, 2006, 163: 109-120.

[16] A. Gojova, J. T. Lee, H. S. Jung,  et al.,  Effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on inflammation in vascular endothelial cells. Inhalation Toxicology, 2009, 21: 123-130.

[17]  M. Mogharabi, M Abdollah, M.A. Faramarzi, Toxicity of nanomaterials; an undermined issue. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2014, 22: 59.

[18]  T.A. Gaziano, A. Bitton, S. Anand, et al., Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle- income countries. Current Problems in Cardiology, 2010, 35: 72-115.

[19]  J.C. Laguna, M Alegret. Regulation of gene expression in atherosclerosis: insights from microarray studies in monocytes/macrophages. Pharmacogenomics, 2012, 13, 477-95.

[20]  R.B. Singh, S.A. Mengi, N.S. Dhalla. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a multifactorial process. Clinical & Experimental Cardiology, 2002, 7: 40-53.

[21] H.A. Hadi, C.S. Carr, J.A. Suwaidi. Endothelial dysfunction: cardiovascular risk factors, therapy, and outcome. Vascular Health and Risk Management, 2005, 1: 183-198.

[22]  K. J. Moore, I, Tabas. The cellular biology of macrophages in atherosclerosis. Cell, 2011, 145: 341-355.

[23] A. Rudijanto,  The role of vascular smooth muscle cells on the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Acta Medica Indonesiana, 2007, 39: 86-93.

[24] A. Nitenberg,  Hypertension, endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk. Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 2006, 99: 915-21.

[25] J. A. Beckman, M. A. Creager, P. Libby.  Diabetes and atherosclerosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2002, 287: 2570-2581.

[26] L. Papatheodorou, N. Weiss,  Vascular oxidant stress and inflammation in hyperhomo-cysteinemia. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2007, 9: 1941-58.

[27]  J.A. Ambrose, R.S. Barua. The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: an update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004, 43: 1731-1737.

[28]  D. Steinberg, J. L. Witztum,  History of discovery oxidized low-density lipoprotein and atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 2010, 30: 2311-2316.

[29]   J. Davignon,  P. Ganz,  Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation, 2004, 109: 27-32.

[30]  N. Chhabra, Endothelial dysfunction-A predictor of atherosclerosis. Internet Journal of Medical Update, 2009, 4: 33-41.

[31] L.M. Yung, F.P. Leung, X. Yao, et al., Reactive oxygen species in vascular wall. Cardiovascular & Hematological Disorders-Drug Targets, 2006, 6: 1-19.

[32]   K.D. O’Brien, T.O. McDonald, A. Chait, et al., Neovascular expression of E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in human atherosclerosis and their relation to intimal leukocyte content. Circulation, 1996, 93: 672-682.

[33]  D. Siegel-Axel, H. Langer, S. Lindemann, et al., Role of platelets in atherosclerosis and inflammation. Medizinische Klinik, 2006, 101: 467-475.

[34] A. Schäfer, J. Bauersachs, Endothelial dysfunction, impaired endogenous platelet inhibition and platelet activation in diabetes and atherosclerosis. Current Vascular Pharmacology, 2008, 6: 52-60.

[35]  A.H. Sprague, R.A. Khalil. Inflammatory cytokines in vascular dysfunction and vascular Disease. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2009, 78: 539-552.

[36]  J.J. Boyle, Macrophage activation in atherosclerosis: pathogenesis and pharmacology of plaque rupture. Current Vascular Pharmacology, 2005, 3: 63-68.

[37]  J. Kunz. Matrix metalloproteinases and atherogenesis in dependence of age. Gerontology, 2007, 53: 63-73.

[38] K. Takahashi, M. Takeya, N. Sakashita. Multifunctional roles of macrophages in the development and progression of atherosclerosis in humans and experimental animals. Medical Electron Microscopy, 2002, 35: 179-203.

[39]  A.C. Doran, N. Meller, C.A. McNamara, The role of smooth muscle cells in the initiation and early progression of atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 2008, 28: 812-819.

[40]  H.J. Duckers, Biological mechanisms of microvessel formation in advanced atherosclerosis: the big five. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2013, 23: 153-164.

[41]  V.E. Stoneman, M.R. Bennett. Role of apoptosis in atherosclerosis and its therapeutic implications. Clinical Science, 2004, 107: 343-354.

[42]  I.Tabas, Macrophage apoptosis in atherosclerosis: consequences on plaque progression and the role of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2009, 11: 2333-2339.

[43]  G. Almer, M. Saba-Lepek, S. Haj-Yahya, et al., Globular domain of adiponectin: promising target molecule for detection of atherosclerotic lesions. Biologics, 2011a, 5: 95-105.

[44]  G. Almer, K. Wernig, M. Saba-Lepek, e t a l ., Adiponectin-coated nanoparticles for enhanced imaging of atherosclerotic plaques. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2011b, 6: 1279-1290.

[45]  D.J. You, G. Saravanakumar, S. Son, et al., Dextran sulfate-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as a contrast agent for atherosclerosis imaging. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2014, 101: 1225-1233.

[46] M.A. Bruckman, K. Jiang, E.J. Simpson, et al., Dual- modal magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging of atherosclerotic plaques in vivo using VCAM-1 targeted tobacco mosaic virus. Nano Letters, 2014, 14: 1551-1558.

[47]  M. Nahrendorf, F.A. Jaffer, K.A Kelly, et al., Noninvasive vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 imaging identifies inflammatory activation of cells in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2006, 114, 1504-1511.

[48]  A. Broisat, S. Hernot, J. Toczek, et al., Nanobodies targeting Mouse/human VCAM1 for the nuclear imaging of atherosclerotic lesions. Circulation Research, 2012, 110: 927-937.

[49]  S. Lee, K.G. Birukov, C.E. Romanoski, et al., Role of phospholipid oxidation products in atherosclerosis. Circular Reference, 2012, 111: 778-799.

[50] T. Saxer, A. Zumbuehl, B. Müller,The use of shear stress for targeted drug delivery. Cardiovascular Research, 2013, 99: 328-333.

[51] C. Muhlen, A. Fink-Petri, J. Salaklang, et al., Imaging monocytes with iron oxide nanoparticles targeted towards the monocyte integrin MAC-1 (CD11b/CD18) does not result in improved atherosclerotic plaque detection by in vivo MRI. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging, 2010, 5: 268-275.

[52]  D.P. Cormode, E. Roessl, A. Thran, et al., Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition: Analysis with multicolor CT and targeted gold nanoparticles. Radiology, 2010, 26: 774-782.

[53] P. Nazari, R. Dowlatabadi-Bazaz, M.R. Mofid, et al., The antimicrobial effects and metabolomic footprinting of carboxyl-capped bismuth nanoparticles against Helicobacter pylori. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology., 2014, 172: 570-579.

[54] S. Ghasemi, M. Heidary, M.A. Faramarzi, et al., Immobilization of lipase on Fe3O4/ZnO core/shell magnetic nanoparticles and catalysis of Michael-type addition to chalcone derivatives. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 2013, 7: 100-108.

[55]  S. Ghasemi, A. Sadighi, M. Heidary, Immobilisation of lipase on the surface of magnetic nanoparticles and non-porous glass beads for regioselective acetylation of prednisolone. IET Nanobiotechnology, 2013, 7: 100-108.

[56]  T.Y. Tang, S.P.S. Howarth, S.R. Miller, et al., The ATHEROMA (atorvastatin therapy: effects on reduction of macrophage activity) study evaluation using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in carotid disease. The Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2009, 53: 2039-2050.

[57]  K. Tsuchiy, N. Nitta, A. Sonod, et al., Evaluation of atherosclerotic lesions using dextran- and mannan- dextran-coated USPIO: MRI analysis and pathological findings. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2012, 7: 2271-2280.

[58]  R. Namgung, K. Singha, M. K. Yu, et al.,  Hybrid superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-branched polyethylenimine magnetoplexes for gene transfection of vascular endothelial cells. Biomaterials, 2010, 31: 4204-4213.

[59]  J.S. Ma, W.J. Kim, J.J. Kim, et al., Gold nanoparticles attenuate LPS-induced NO production through the inhibition of NF-jB and IFN-b/STAT1 pathways in RAW264.7 cells. Nitric Oxide, 2010, 23: 214-219.

[60]  C. Yuan, W.S. Kerwin, V.L. Yarnykh, et al., MRI of atherosclerosis in clinical trials. NMR in Biomedicine, 2006, 19: 636-654.

[61]  C.L. Korte, H.C. Hansen, A.F.W. Steen, Vascular ultrasound for atherosclerosis imaging. Interface Focus, 2011, 1: 565-575.

[62] H. Orbay, H. Hong, Y. Zhang, et al., Positron emission tomography imaging of atherosclerosis. Theranostics, 2013, 3: 894-902.

[63]  S. Achenbach, P. Raggi, Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis by computed tomography. European Heart Journal, 2010, 31: 1442-1448.

[64]  L.C. Winkel, H.C. Groen, B.S. Van Thiel, et al., Folate receptor-targeted single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography to detect activated macrophages in atherosclerosis: can it distinguish vulnerable from stable atherosclerotic plaques? Molecular Imaging, 2013, 12: 1-5.

[65]  S. Marrache, S. Dhar. Biodegradable synthetic high- density lipoprotein nanoparticles for atherosclerosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110: 9445-9450.

[66]  G. Saravanakumar, K. Kim, J.H. Park, et al., Current status of nanoparticle-based imaging agents for early diagnosis of cancer and atherosclerosis. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, 2009, 5: 20-35.

[67]  C. Psarros, R. Lee, M. Margaritis, et al., Nanomedicine for the prevention, treatment and imaging of atherosclerosis. Maturitas, 2012, 73: 52-60.

[68]  A. Giasuddin, K. Jhuma, M. Haq, Use of gold nanoparticles in diagnostics, surgery and medicine: A Review. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Biochemistry, 2012, 5: 56-60.

[69]  H.L. Karlsson, J. Gustafsson, P. Cronholm, et al., Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles A comparison between nano- and micrometer size. Toxicology Letters, 2009, 188: 112-118.

[70]  S. Litovsky, M. Madjid, A. Zarrabi, et al., Superparamagnetic iron oxide-based method for quantifying recruitment of monocytes to mouse atherosclerotic lesions in vivo: enhancement by tissue necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, and interferon- gamma. Circulation, 2003, 107: 1545-1549.

[71]  M. Michalska, Visualization of vascular inflammation in the atherosclerotic mouse by ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide vascular cell adhesion molecule-1-specific nanoparticles. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2012, 32: 2350-2357.

[72] M. Sigovan, Rapid-clearance iron nanoparticles for inflammation imaging of atherosclerotic plaque: initial experience in animal model. Radiology, 2009, 252: 401-409.

[73] H. Li, M.H. El-Dakdouki, D.C. Zhu, et al., Synthesis of β-cyclodextrin conjugated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for selective binding and detection of cholesterol crystals. Chemical Communications, 2012, 48:3385-3387.

[74]  A. Kunzmann, B. Andersson, C. Vogt, Efficient internalization of silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles of different sizes by primary human macrophages and dendritic cells. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2011, 253: 81-93.

[75]  A. Bumb, M.W. Brechbiel, Synthesis and characterization of ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles thinly coated with silica. Nanotechnology, 2008, 19: 335601-335606.

[76]  C. Burtea, S. Ballet, S. Laurent, et al., Development of a magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the characterization of atherosclerotic plaque by using vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and apoptosis- targeted ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide derivatives. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 2012, 32: e36-e48.

[77]  S. Howarth, Z. Y. Li, R. A. Trivedi, et al., Correlation of macrophage location and plaque stress distribution using USPIO-enhanced MRI in a patient with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis: a new insight into risk stratification. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 2007, 21: 396-398.

[78] D. K. Kim, M. Mikhaylova, F. H Wang, et al., Starch-coated superparamagnetic nano-particles as MR contrast agents. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2003b, 15: 4343- 4351.

[79] G. Li, K. Huang, Y. Jiang, et al., Preparation and characterization of carboxyl functionalization of chitosan derivative magnetic nanoparticles. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 40: 408-414.

[80]  G. Li,    Y. Jiang,    K. Huang,    et al.,    Kinetics of adsorption of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mandelated dehydrogenase on magnetic Fe3O4-chitosan nanoparticles.  Colloids and Surfaces A, 2008, 320: 11-18.   

[81]  D. Olsen, C. Yang, M. Bodo, et al., Recombinant collagen and gelatin for drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2003, 55: 1547-1567.

[82]  B. Gaihre, S. Aryal, M.S. Khil, et al., Encapsulation of Fe3O4 in gelatin nanoparticles: Effect of different parameters on size and stability of the colloidal dispersion. Journal of Microencapsulation, 2008, 25: 21-30.

[83]  S. Mondini, S. Cenedese, G. Marinoni, et al., One-step synthesis and functionalization of hydroxyl-decorated magnetite Nanoparticles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2008, 322: 173-179.

[84] S.M. Moghimi, A.C. Hunter, J.C. Murray. Long- circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice. Pharmacological Reviews, 2001, 53: 283-318.

[85] U. Sakulkhu, M. Mahmoudi, L. Maurizi, et al., Protein corona composition of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with various physico-chemical properties and coatings. Science Reports, 2014, 4: 5020.

[86]  H. L. Ma, Y. F. Xu, X. R. Qi,  et al.,  Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles stabilized by alginate: Pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, and applications in detecting liver cancers. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2008, 354: 217-226.

[87]   M. Zhu, B. Wang, Y. Wang, et al., Endothelial dysfunction and inflammation induced by iron oxide nanoparticle exposure: Risk factors for early atherosclerosis. Toxicology Letters, 2011, 203: 162-171.

[88] S. Wagner, J. Schnorr, A. Ludwig, et al., Contrast- enhanced MR imaging of atherosclerosis using citrate- coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: calcifying microvesicles as imaging target for plaque characterization. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2013, 8: 767-779.

[89]  F.  Mohammad,  T. Arfin.  Thermodynamics  and electrochemical characterization of core shell type goldcoated  superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Advanced Materials Letters, 2014, 5: 315-324.

[90]  D. Thorek,  A. K. Chen,  J. Czupryna,  et al.,  Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2006, 34: 23-38.

[91] M.A. Faramarzi, A. Sadighi, Insights into biogenic and chemical production of inorganic nanomaterials and nanostructures. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2013, 189-190: 1-20.

[92]   J. Lodhia, G. Mandarano, N.J. Ferris, et al., Development and use of iron oxide nanoparticles (Part 1): Synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles for MRI. The Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 2010, 6: e12.

[93] R. Thomas, I. Park, Y.Y. Jeong, Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and therapy of cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2013,14: 15910-15930.

[94] S. Metz, G. Bonaterra, M. Rudelius, et al., Capacity of human monocytes to phagocytose approved iron oxide MR contrast agents in vitro. European Radiology, 2004,14: 1851-1858.

[95] M. Settles, M. Etzrodt, K. Kosanke, et al., Different capacity of monocyte subsets to phagocytose iron-oxide nanoparticles. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e25197.

[96]  S.G. Ruehm, C. Corot, P. Vogt, Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque with ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation, 2001, 103: 415-422.

[97] K. Morishige, D.F. Kacher, P. Libby, et al., High- resolution magnetic resonance imaging enhanced with uperparamagnetic nanoparticles measures macrophage burden in atherosclerosis, Circulation, 2010, 122: 1707-1715.

[98] M. Sigovan, L. Boussel, A. Sulaiman, et al., Rapid- clearance iron nanoparticles for inflammation imaging of atherosclerotic plaque: initial experience in animal model. Radiology, 2009, 252: 401-409.

[99] J.B. Morris, A.R. Olzinski, R.E. Bernard, et al., MAPK inhibition reduces aortic ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide uptake in a mouse model of atherosclerosis MRI assessment. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 2008, 28: 265-271.

[100] V.V. Kunjathoor, M. Febbraio, E.A. Podrez, et al., cavenger receptors class A-I/II and CD36 are the principal receptors responsible for the uptake of modified low density lipoprotein leading to lipid loading in macrophages. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2002, 277: 49982-49988.

[101] K.J. Moore, M.W. Freeman, Scavenger receptors in atherosclerosis: beyond lipid uptake. Arterioscler. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 2006, 26: 1702-1711.

[102] B.R. Jarrett, C. Correa, K.L. Ma, et al., In vivo mapping of vascular inflammation using multimodal imaging. PLoS One, 2010, 5: e13254.

[103] X. Li, M.C. Kramer, C.M. van der Loos, et al., A pattern of disperse plaque microcalcifications identifies a subset of plaques with high inflammatory burden in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis, 2011, 218: 83-89.

[104] M. Aikawa, P. Libby. The vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque: pathogenesis and therapeutic approach. Cardiovascular Pathology, 2004, 13: 125-138.

[105] R. Virmani, A.P. Burke, A. Farb, et al., Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. The Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006, 47: C13-C18.

[106] A.A. Alsheikh-Ali, G.D. Kitsios, E.M. Balk, et al., The vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque: scope of the literature. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2010, 153: 387-395.

[107] F. Scherer, M. Anton, U. Schillinger, et al., Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo. Gene Therapy, 2003, 9: 102-109.

[108] C. Plank, U. Schillinger, F. Scherer, et al., The magnetofection method: using magnetic force to enhance gene delivery. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2003, 384: 737-747.

[109] Y.S. Kim, Y. Ahn, M.H. Hong, et al., Curcumin attenuates inflammatory responses of TNF-alpha-stimulated human endothelial cells. The Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 2007, 50: 41-49.

[110] W.J. Rogers, P. Basu. Factors regulating macrophage endocytosis of nanoparticles: implications for targeted magnetic resonance plaque imaging. Atherosclerosis, 2005, 178: 67-73.

[111] I. Raynal, P. Prigent, S. Peyramaure,et al., Macrophage endocytosis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles mechanisms and comparison of ferumoxides and ferumoxtran-10. Investigative Radiology, 2004, 39: 56-63.

[112] P. Schuler, D. Assefa, J. Ylänne, et al., Adhesion of monocytes to medical steel as used for vascular stents is mediated by the integrin receptor Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18; alphaM beta2) and can be inhibited by semiconductor coating. Cell Communication and Adhesion, 2003, 10: 17-26.

[113] C. Muhlen, D. Elverfeldt, N. Bassler, et al., Superparamagnetic iron oxide binding and uptake as imaged by magnetic resonance is mediated by the integrin receptor Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18): Implications on imaging of atherosclerotic plaques. Atherosclerosis, 2007, 193: 102-111.

[114] D. Pissuwan, T. Niidome, M.B. Cortie, The forthcoming applications of gold nanoparticles in drug and gene delivery systems. Journal of Controlled Release, 2009, 149: 65-71.

[115] P.M. Tiwari, K. Vig, V.A. Dennis, et al., Functionalized gold nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. Nanomaterials, 2011, 1: 31-63.

[116] P. Ghosh, G. Han, M. De, et al., Gold nanoparticles in delivery Applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2008, 60: 1307-1315.

[117] E.E. Connor, J. Mwamuka, A. Gole, et al., Gold nanoparticles are taken up by human cells but do not cause acute cytotoxicity. Small, 2005, 1: 325-327.

[118] M.A. Faramarzi, H. Forootanfar, Biosynthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles produced by laccase from Paraconiothyrium variabile. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2011, 87: 23-27.

[119] M. Moshfegh, H. Frorootanfar, B. Zare, et al., Biological synthesis of Au, Ag and Au-Ag bimetallic nanoparticles by alpha-amylase. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, 2011, 6: 1419-1426

[120] E.K. Lim, E. Jang, J. Kim, et al., Self-fabricated dextran- coated gold nanoparticles using pyrenyl dextran as a reducible stabilizer and their application as CT imaging agents for atherosclerosis. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22; 17518-17524.

[121] A. Kharlamov, J. Gabinsky, A.N. Perrish, et al., Plasmonic nanophotothermal and stem cell therapy of atherosclerotic plaque as the novel tool for angioplasty and artery remodeling. Rejuvenation Research, 2012,15: 222-230.

[122] I.L. Maksimova, G.G. Akchurin, B.N. Khlebtsov, et al., Near- infrared laser photothermal therapy of cancer by using gold nanoparticles: computer simulations and experiment. Medical Laser Application, 2007, 22: 199-206.

[123] N. Khlebtsov, G. Akchurin, B. Khlebtsov, et al., Laser induced destruction of gold NPs: new weapons in the cell- killing arsenal. SPIE, 2008, 9: 1-3.

[124] A.N. Kharlamov, A.E. Tyurnina, V.S. Veselova, et al., Plasmonics for treatment of atherosclerosis: results of NANOM-FIM trial. Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology, 2013, 4: 1-13.

[125] B. Wang, E. Yantsen, T. Larson, et al., Plasmonic intravascular photoacoustic imaging for detection of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. Nano Letters, 2009, 9: 2212-2217.

[126] A.M. Alkilany, L.B. Thompson, S.P. Boulos, et al., Gold nanorods: their potential for photothermal therapeutics and drug delivery, tempered by the complexity of their biological interactions. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2012, 64: 190-199.

[127] Z.W.J. Zhang, C. Chen, Gold nanorods based platforms for light-mediated theranostics. Theranostics, 2013, 3: 223-238.

[128] D. Yeager, Y. Chen, S. Litovsky, et al., Intravascular photoacoustics for image-guidance and temperature monitoring during plasmonic photothermal therapy of atherosclerotic plaques: A feasibility study. Theranostics, 2014, 4: 36-46.

[129] A.N. Kharlamov, J.L. Gabinsky, Plasmonic photothermic and stem cell therapy of atherosclerotic plaque as a novel nanotool for angioplasty and artery remodeling. Rejuvenation Research, 2012, 15: 222-230.

[130] T. Taufikurohmah, I.G.M. Sanjaya, A. Baktir, et al., Activity test of nanogold for reduction of free radicals, a pre-assessment utilization nanogold in pharmaceutical as medicines and cosmetics. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 2012, 2: 611-616.

[131] H.T. Chung, H.O. Pae, B.M. Choi, et al., Nitric oxide as a bioregulator of apoptosis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2001, 282: 1075-1079.

[132] I. Iavicoli, L. Fontana, V. Leso, et al., The effects of nanomaterials as endocrine disruptors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2013, 14: 16732-16801.

[133] S. BarathManiKanth, K. Kalishwaralal, M. Sriram, et al., Anti-oxidant effect of gold nanoparticles restrains hyperglycemic conditions in diabetic mice. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 2010, 8: 16.

[134] J. Banerjee, N.R. T, Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Syzygium cumini (L.) Seed extract and evaluation of their in vitro antioxidant activities. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, 2011, 6: 961-968.

[135] K. Bhol, P. Schechter, Effects of nanocrystalline silver (NPI 32101) in a rat model of ulcerative colitis. Digestive diseases and sciences, 2007, 52: 2732-2742.

[136] P.L. Nadworny, B.K. Landry, J. Wang, et al., Does nanocrystalline silver have a transferable effect? Wound Repair and Regeneration, 2010, 18: 254-265.

[137] K.K.Y. Wong, S.O.F. Cheung, L. Huang, et al., Further evidence of the antiinflammatory effects of silver nanoparticle. Medicinal Chemistry Communications, 2009, 4: 1129-1135.

[138] H. Brandl, S. Lehmann, M.A. Faramarzi, et al., Biomobilization of silver, gold, and platinum from soil waste materials by HCN-forming microorganisms. Hydrometallurgy, 2008, 94: 14-17.

[139] K. Kalishwaralal, S. Barathmanikanth, S.R. Pandian, et al., Silver nano a trove for retinal therapies. Journal of Controlled Release, 2010, 145: 76-90. [140] H.H. Lara, N.V. AyalaNunez, L. IxtepanTurrent, et al., Mode of antiviral action of silver nanoparticles against HIV1. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 2010, 8: 1-10.

[141] S. Gurunathan, K.J. Lee, K. Kalishwaralal, et al., Antiangiogenic properties of silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials, 2009, 30: 6341-6350.

[142] G.S. Kang, P.A. Gillespie, A. Gunnison, et al., Long- term inhalation exposure to nickel nanoparticles exacerbated atherosclerosis in a susceptible mouse model. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2011, 119: 176-181.

[143] M.M. Kemp, A. Kumar, S. Mousa, et al., Gold and silver nanoparticles conjugated with heparin derivative possess anti-angiogenesis properties. Nanotechnology, 2009, 20: 455104-455111.

[144] S. Sheikpranbabu, K. Kalishwaralal, D. Venkataraman, et al., Silver nanoparticles inhibit VEGF-and IL-1β- induced vascular permeability via Src dependent pathway in porcine retinal endothelial cells. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 2009, 7: 8.

[145] W.J. Trickler, S.M. Lantz, R.C. Murdock, et al., Silver nanoparticle induced blood-brain barrier inflammation and increased permeability in primary rat brain microvessel endothelial cells. Toxicological Sciences, 2010, 118: 160-170.

[146] J. Shi, X. Sun, Y. Lin, et al., Endothelial cell injury and dysfunction induced by silver nanoparticles through oxidative stress via IKK/NF-κB pathways. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 6657-6666.

[147] P.J. Polverini, Angiogenesis and wound healing: basic discoveries, clinical implications, and therapeutic opportunities. Endodontic Topics, 2012, 24: 130-145

[148] A. Hoeben, B. Landuyt, M.S. Highley, et al., Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis. Pharmacological Reviews, 2004, 56: 549-580.

[149] R. Khurana, M. Simons, J.F. Martin, et al., Role of angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease a critical appraisal. Circulation, 2005, 112: 1813-1824.

[150] V.J.D. Krouwer, L.H.P. Hekking, M. Langelaar-Makkinje, et al., Endothelial cell senescence is associated with disrupted cell-cell junctions and increased monolayer permeability. Vascular Cell, 2012, 4: 12.

[151] S. Sheikpranbabu, K. Kalishwaralal, K.J. Lee. The inhibition of advanced glycation endproductsinduced retinal vascular permeability by silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2010, 31, 2260-2271.

[152] F. Giacco, M. Brownlee. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circulation Research, 2010, 106: 1449-1458.

[153] S. Sheikpranbabu, K. Kalishwaralal, K.J. Lee, et al., The inhibition of advanced glycation endproductsinduced retinal vascular permeability by silver nanoparticles.

Biomaterials, 2010, 31: 2260-2271.

[154] H. Rosas-Hernandez, S. Jimenez-Badillo, P.P. Martinez- Cuevas, et al., Effects of 45 nm silver nanoparticles on coronary endothelial cells and isolated rat aortic rings. Toxicology Letters, 2009, 191: 305-313.

[155] Y.F. Li, Y. Gao, Z. Chaiab, et al., Nanometallomics: an emerging field studying the biological effects of metal- related nanomaterials. Metallomics, 2014, 6: 220-232.

[156] K. Peters, R.E. Unger, C.J. Kirkpatrick, et al., Effects of nano-scaled particles on endothelial cell function in vitro: studies on viability, proliferation and inflammation. The Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2004, 15: 321-325.

[157] H. Yamawaki, N. Iwai. Mechanisms underlying nano- sized air-pollution-mediated progression of athero- sclerosis: carbon black causes cytotoxic injury/ inflammation and inhibits cell growth in vascular endothelial cells. Circulation Journal, 2006, 70: 129-140.

[158] M. Yu, Y. Mo, R. Wan, et al., Regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in endothelial cells with exposure to metal nanoparticles. Toxicology Letters, 2010, 195: 82-89.

[159] N. Li, M. Hao, R.F. Phalen, et al., Particulate air pollutants and asthma. A paradigm for the role of oxidative stress in PM-induced adverse health effects. Clinical Immunology, 2003a, 109: 250-265.

[160] N. Li, C. Sioutas, A. Cho, et al., Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2003b, 111: 455-460.

[161] Y. Suzuki, S. Tada-Oikawa, G. Ichihara, et al., Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce migration and adhesion of monocytes toendothelial cells and accelerate foam cell formation. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2014, 278: 16-25.

[162] H. Li, M.H. El-Dakdouki, D.C. Zhu, et al., Synthesis of β-cyclodextrin conjugated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for selective binding and detection of cholesterol crystals. Chemical Communications, 2012, 48: 3385-3387.

[163] T.C. Tsou, S.C. Yeh, F.Y. Tsai, et al. Zinc oxide particles induce inflammatory responses in vascular endothelial cells via NF-κB signaling. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 183: 1.

[164] W. Song, J. Zhang, J. Guo, et al., Role of the dissolved zinc ion and reactive oxygen species in cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Toxicology Letters, 2010, 199: 389-397.

[165] C. Kojima, A. Kawakami, T. Takei, et al., Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor attenuates monocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium through modulation of intracellular zinc. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2007, 323: 855-860.

[166] Z. Bian, T. Tachikawa, P. Zhang, et al., Exhibiting efficient charge separation and unprecedented activity. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136: 458-465.

[167] A. Hu, X. Zhang, D. Luong, et al., Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation kinetics of pharmaceuticals by TiO2 nanowires during water treatment. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2012, 3: 443-449.

[168] A. Nemmar, H. Vanbilloen, M.F. Hoylaerts, et al., Passage of intratracheally instilled ultrafine particles from the lung into the systemic circulation in hamster. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001; 164: 1665-1668.

[169] L. Mikkelsen, M. Sheykhzade, K.A. Jensen, et al., Modest effect on plaque progression and vasodilatory function in atherosclerosis-prone mice exposed to nanosized TiO2. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 2011, 8: 32-48.

[170] A. Montiel-Dávalos, J.L. Ventura-Gallegos, E. Alfaro- Moreno, et al., TiO2  nanoparticles induce dysfunction and activation of human endothelial cells. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2012, 25: 920-930.

[171] K. Kang, D.H. Lim, I.H. Choi, et al., Vascular tube formation and angiogenesis induced by polyvinylpyr- rolidone-coated silver nanoparticles. Toxicology Letters, 2011, 205: 227-234.

[172] M. Ahamed, Toxic response of nickel nanoparticles in human lung epithelial A549 cells. Toxicology in Vitro, 2011, 25: 930-936.

[173] W.C. Aird, Endothelial cell heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2014, 2: 1-13.

 

Copyright© 2015 Fatemeh Imanparast, Mahmood Doosti and Mohammad Ali Faramarzi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Nano Biomedicine and Engineering.

Copyright © Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press